Thursday, January 17, 2013

Watching Others Teach



Today I watched dozens of teaching videos. Some of them I liked very much, others were not that interesting (I mean from an observer’s point of view of course). Here, in my blog I’d like to share with my reflections aroused by 2 clips.

The first one is about task-based teaching. Here it is: 


The activity is task-based, so the main objective is to teach students how to use the language outside the classroom, in the real world. But what I see in the video is an instructor giving handouts with precomposed dialogues, which actually ruin the very idea of the activity. Because students just do reading and gap filling. There is no improvisation in the air.
If I decided to give my students this activity I would do the following:
  1. As a pre-task I would ask my students to make a list of features (location, facilities, pet policy, etc.) characterizing the apartment THEY are looking for or they’d like to have.
  2. I would bring to class realia (for instance, ‘For Rent’ advertisements from local newspapers).
  3. I would split the class into Landlords and Renters (instead of A’s and B’s). Landlords would have advertisements I had prepared (maybe even 2 or 3 for each) and Renters would have their own criteria for apartment selection.
  4. Then I would definitely ask them to switch the roles, so that every student would have an opportunity to be both a landlord and a renter.
  5. During post-activity discussion all of them would have a chance to speak out (name the apartment of their choice and explain why).
Task-based activities are always the best choice when we deal with EAL students. First of all, students value such activities because they really will need this knowledge in the real world. Secondly, if presented correctly, task-based activities leave much deeper imprints in students’ minds than any other activities, because human nature is very selective – we take only those things we consider useful and applicable.
The task based approach to language teaching is considered to be one of the most effective nowadays. And I can’t argue with that. The majority of EAL students in Canada are newcomers. And most of the things, which we experience during the everyday life, seem natural and simple to Canadian-born native speakers, but they are quite challenging for recently landed immigrants. Newcomers may have a lot of difficulty, not only because they are learning a new language, but because they are also learning a very different way of life.

The second video is about games in the EAL classroom. I really enjoyed this one:


I liked a great degree of students’ involvement the instructor managed to achieve, the positive atmosphere and competitive spirit. Students smile a lot and encourage each other.
Although I would add some activities involving more interaction between students.
I can’t tell what part of the lesson is this. If it is the very beginning of the lesson and the main aim is to revise material from the preceding lesson, then it’s really effective. I think the main “spice” of this video is in action. Students run and wack the white board, they clap to each other and so on. The instructor is also very energetic. Like morning exercises can make the whole day, energetic and fun warm up activities can make the whole lesson.
The main aim of the video is to depict how games may be used in the learning process. They are always very involving and thus effective. All adults enjoy playing games. Thus games in the EAL learning process let us mix business with pleasure. A Chinese proverb “Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand” proves a tremendous role of EAL games in the process of language acquisition.


Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Syllabus design


Syllabus Design (by David Nunan)

Grammatical Syllabus
Language is considered to be a set of rules, various combinations of which produce meaning;
LL has to master each rule in the order suggested by the syllabus;
Input control: LL is given one item at a time;
The approach dilemma: input control in the classroom vs. real-life language outside the classroom;
Shortcomings of grammatical approach:
It does not represent the complexity of the language;
The language is not necessarily acquired by LL in the order specified in the grammatical syllabus.

Notional-Functional Syllabus
The learning process is not described in terms of grammatical categories, but in terms of notions and functions.
Notions = general conceptional meanings; the context of communication (e.g. time, cause, duration, etc.)
Functions = communicative purposes (in a given context) achieved through the language (e.g. apologizing, asking for prices, giving compliments, etc.)

Content-Based Syllabus
Language is not presented directly, but through the content of other subjects. In other words, particular content is integrated within L teaching.
Ls acquire target language in the course of doing other things.

Task-Based Syllabus
Needs analysis precedes TB syllabus design. On the basis of needs analysis a list of communicative tasks is designed.
Target task = what learners have to do outside the classroom;
Pedagogic tasks are created to initiate a communication between learners in the target language (in the classroom).
Tasks can be reproductive and creative.
In reproductive tasks learners reproduce language following some model or pattern.
Creative language tasks are less predictable.

In his article Nunan also suggests an integrated approach to syllabus design that touches upon core components of each type of syllabus. 

Course Outline Examples

Course outline - example #1
:-)
Nice positive images, various informal fonts, the party announcement.
:-(
No information on presentation format, textbooks or other course materials.

Course outline - example #2
:-)
Creative class information presentation (Wh-questions), images relevant to course goals; motivating course description (‘ You can learn a lot in 1 month!’).
:-(
No information on the course title, the teacher’s contact information, timeframes for the whole course and/or each module, presentation format, textbooks or other course materials, assessment (assignments information, evaluation rubrics).

Course outline - example #3
:-)
Creative course description, no missing elements.



Activity 2 from “Teaching ESL in Canada”

Course description – example #1
:-)
The description mentions key elements of the course: the target audience, skills that are improved during this course, materials and presentation format.
:-(
The description does not mention learners’ language level.
The language is too academic and it might be too complicated for target learners.
So I would make the whole description less formal, I would add direct questions to learners and add more ‘you’ sentences. And I would underline the importance of the language improvement for service industry workers (something like “The better English you have – the better job you’ll get!”).

Course description – example #2
:-)
The style and syntax of the description is formal, although it is still quite easy-to-read. And it’s the main aim of any writing course: to learn how to express one’s thoughts clearly and in appropriate language. So the description reaches the desired effect. Besides it’s quite informative and covers main points of interest.

Course description – example #3
:-)
The language of the description correlates with learners’ language level.
:-(
The description is too general. I would add more specific details.
 
 

Sunday, January 13, 2013

What Makes a Good Teacher?


The process of getting education, that we are enrolled into during our life, implies dozens of classroom-based courses held by different teachers. As far as human’s nature is judgmental we give all those teachers different labels, like ‘a good teacher’, ‘a strict teacher’, ‘a demanding teacher’, etc. And what qualities and characteristics distinguish a good teacher?
To answer this question I tried to analyze my own experience of being a student and thought of my teachers I consider to be ‘good’ ones.
  • A good teacher does not just give information; he/she is really enthusiastic for the subject and wants to share it with learners. When a teacher managed to transfuse their enthusiasm into me, my motivation, and thus my understanding of learning material, increased tremendously.
  • A good teacher shows respect towards his/her learners and treats them more like colleagues or partners.
  • A good teacher tries to create a positive and collaborative atmosphere in the classroom. 
  • Another important trait of a good teacher is an excellent preparation for a lesson. A good teacher always prepares all materials in advance, as well as he/she always has a backup plan.
  • A good teacher is creative and students never get dull during the lesson as far as it is full of various meaningful and interesting activities.
  • And last but not least, a good teacher has a sense of humour. He/she knows when it is appropriate to laugh with a class, because humour within the classroom can reduce embarrassment and release tension students might feel.
We can observe the presence/absence of these characteristics while watching online videos of someone teaching. Although we will never know if this teacher is really supportive, enthusiastic, well-prepared and has a great sense of humour or he just plays to the camera.

To sum up I’d like to quote William Arthur Ward: “The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires”.