It’s up to
a teacher to decide how to present new material: to give the rule to learners
or to make learners discover this rule by themselves. Technically, the result
will be the same: learners know the rule. In fact there is an enormous gap between
being told about something and discover something by yourself.
As an EAL
instructor I prefer inductive approach in teaching grammar. First of all, it is
much more engaging and motivating for learners. Inductive grammar lesson
assures adult learners that their teacher trusts them and is quite confident
with their language skills. To some degree they do not want to let their
teacher down, and that is why learners do their best to figure out how everything
works. A good Chinese proverb states: Tell me, I’ll forget. Show me, I’ll
remember. Involve me, I’ll understand. Inductive grammar lessons are all about
involving, thus about understanding.
Secondly, inductive
grammar lessons hold endless creativity opportunities for the instructor:
realia in the classroom, field trips, stories from personal experience, etc. Therefore,
grammar lessons are fun and might contribute to the flow in the classroom.
At the same
time, I am aware of disadvantages of ‘discovery’ approach (it can be too time-consuming;
learners may not get some ideas or misconceive them). In these cases, I prefer
to resort to Plan B (deductive grammar teaching). For example, I can explain one aspect of the rule deductively, and then get back to discovery
adventures again.